Why Choose Zakay Law Group?
The Right Firm Makes a Difference
-
Aggressive Representation for California EmployeesWe are relentless in fighting for your rights. With a mission to ensure fair treatment of all employees, we hold employers accountable and pursue justice for violations of California employment laws.
-
Proven Track Record of SuccessOur team has recovered millions of dollars in settlements for employees, ranging from small businesses to large corporations.
-
Free Consultations AvailableAt Zakay Law Group, we believe that every employee deserves the opportunity to seek justice without barriers. That’s why we offer free consultations to all potential clients.
-
Personalized Service, Powerful ResultsAs a boutique firm we deliver personalized attention to every case, while collaborating with larger firms to pool resources, ensuring our clients receive top-tier representation against even the biggest corporations.
ADA vs. FEHA: What California Employees Need to Know
Two laws protect San Diego workers from disability discrimination: the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted in 1990, and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). Both prohibit discrimination based on disability, but FEHA offers significantly broader protections. The ADA applies to employers with 15 or more employees. FEHA applies to employers with as few as five, which means a much larger share of San Diego workers have a claim under state law even if the federal threshold isn’t met.
FEHA’s definition of disability is also wider. It covers any physical or mental condition that limits a major life activity, including temporary conditions. Cancer, diabetes, HIV/AIDS, depression, anxiety disorders, PTSD, chronic pain, and back injuries all qualify. Equally important: FEHA protects employees who are perceived as disabled by their employer, even when no actual impairment exists. A worker doesn’t need a permanent or severe condition to have a protected claim under California law.
What Disability Discrimination Actually Looks Like
Disability discrimination isn’t limited to outright termination. The conduct covered under ADA and FEHA is broad:
- Denial of reasonable accommodation without exploring alternatives or claiming undue hardship without basis
- Failure to engage in the interactive process, itself an independent violation under FEHA even if a reasonable accommodation may ultimately not have been feasible
- Retaliation for requesting an accommodation, including demotion, pay cuts, reduced hours, or termination
- Discrimination in hiring or promotion based on a disability or perceived disability
- Harassment because of a disability, including exclusion from workplace activities or a pattern of conduct that creates a hostile work environment
These violations are documented across San Diego’s healthcare, biotech, hospitality, education, and retail sectors. When the same unlawful practice affects multiple employees at one company, a single worker’s experience can become the foundation of a much larger case.
The Interactive Process & Reasonable Accommodation
Under FEHA, employers must provide reasonable accommodations that allow a qualified employee with a disability to perform the essential functions of their job, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty or expense. That standard, known as undue hardship, sets a high bar.
Reasonable accommodations can include:
- Modified work schedules or shift changes
- Physical modifications to the workspace
- Assistive technology
- Job restructuring that removes non-essential duties
- Remote work arrangements
- Extended leave for treatment or recovery
California law requires employers to engage in a timely, good-faith interactive process the moment an employee communicates a need for accommodation or the employer becomes aware of a potential disability. An employee doesn’t need to name their specific diagnosis to trigger that obligation. Ignoring the request, stalling without reason, or refusing to discuss options exposes the employer to liability regardless of what the outcome of that conversation would have been.